japanese occupation :: essays research papers

The the Statesn occupation of JapanFifty geezerhood after the end of the second World War, it is easy to look game on the American occupation of Japan and see it as a mild nudge to the left alternatively than a sore scratch for the country. We still see an emperor, even if only as a symbol. Industry, when it was rebuilt, was downstairs much of the same leadership as before the war. Many elements of the traditionalistic lifestyle remainedwith less regimen support and in competition with new variants. The Japanese people remained connected to a culture which was half horse opera and half Japanese. N ever sotheless, it is irrefutable that the yielding in 1945 had a major stir on the lives of the Japanese. Political deviateies, elected by the populous, became a great commode more influential in the government. This changed the dynamics of Japanese industry, even if the zaibatsu were sill the bum of the economy. Financial success took on a new character the drudgery of hi gh tech goods for sale to the worlds most unquestionable countries was now a better source of income. The affluence of the upper figure was more evenly distributed. On a broader scale, for the first time, America had more influence than European powers. The prevention of the formation of a military model the focus of the government on trade, the United Nations, and the cold war rather than an empire in Asia. Simultaneously, social attitudes and lifestyle were more independent of the government and consumer led.The American military occupation of Japan was the driving reason for all of the changes in postwar Japan. Its first task, determined even before the surrender was to disarm Japan and to remove the wartime leaders from their influential government positions. This was part of Americas protrude to demilitarize and democratize. The goal was to purge the government, media, and education system of war criminals. Once this was accomplished, the American focus shifted to reform. The American plan for reform was based on the idea that Japanese aggression had real because of fundamental faults in the government, (not, as the Japanese said, from a temporary aside from the course set during the Meiji period) and that these faults had to be corrected before Japan could ever become a respected member of the developed world. Democratization was what America wanted.The first steps in the reforming process were obstructive to Americas goal of democracy.