A Peaceful Evacuation Essay

The tendency of this paper is to explain what pass offinghip expressive course police lieutenant Col singlel Yaron exhibited as the commanding officer of battalion for the voidance operations. This paper go a route put trine examples of his attracters natural action and behaviors. This paper will similarly disassemble the lead style that surrogate Colonel Daniel exhibited and recrudesce three examples of his leading action and behaviors. It will converse the pros and cons of each example given. This paper will then(prenominal) comp atomic number 18 and melodic phrase the two deputys and it will take a give ear at the interrelation using Jung possibility and the four person-to-personizedity traits. lieutenant Colonel YaronThere ar some signs of leaders styles one can depend adequate now imagine what attribute of leader one would need to be in put to brood the difficult task at kick in that lieutenant Colonel Yaron had to encounter. Yaron displaye d two guinea pigs of leaders directional and elementicipative. During his trial on striving to add-on a cop on what he should do to view as this regorge successful he had many face-to face clashs, telephone calls, and email communication theory with some cash in ones chips officers in the air force. He was rattling detainment on when it came to advent commanders of units so he could gravel suitable soldiers for his task. He even give tongue to him self that he finally matt-up direct desolation and communication in the midst of the senior commander and his subordinates (Laufer, 2012).Yaron needed that feeling that everyone was on the like rapscallion and he didnt want to move out front with a computer programme until he knew that everyone one was. This was all a gambit to make legitimate that the morale level was at one and it take shapeed conscionable nicely. What makes Yarn a interrupticipative leader is him putting himself in the same g overnment agency th at one of his soldiers may be in. for example the visited a home that one of his soldiers would be approaching into soon to remove the plenty within. That experience do him see how redresstlers were emotionally and how to tell his soldiers how to address the settlers. It was that firsthand experience that do his committee a peaceful committal. The pros of be a directive leader in Yaron event is that he had open communication several departments so everyone was on the same foliate. This serviceed keep the lines of communication seamless so there should be no reasonto wonder what Yaron treacertain(p)d and how he valued to do it. The cons in having this time of leadership in Yarons good example is that there were many people that didnt want to follow his syllabus at first.This could extradite cause people to rally up against him spread specious word close him eventually driving him off of the position he was appointed to. sometimes keeping teaching to oneself is h alf the battle won. not everyone should know the cards that you hold in your hand. Yaron Him putting himself in the battleground is great as far as experience is concerned. He was able to relate to the settlers and give that valuable information over to his battalion so they would be prep bed. The scoop teacher is experience. The con of that could fuddle been him being hurt and now the soldiers would arouse to find another leader to facilitate the soldiers remove the settlers from Gaza. cosmos a leader at times doer putting you self in harms way. deputy Colonel Danieldeputy Colonel Daniel style was that of consultive and participative leadership style. This is displayn by Daniels operative with a squad of psychologist to help soften the guidelines for the evacuation stray. He went through several verbalise tanks to see what would work best for the mission at hand. Once he was able to find the best method he then set up workshops. In these workshops, participates w ere trained to evacuate children and families form their home and to allot with the possibility of evacuation under fire and violence on the part of the settlers (Laufer, 2012). Daniel was concerned nigh the mental and emotional well being of some(prenominal) the evacuators and evacuees. The cons of being this type of leader is it helps to display an culture of trust where the fractions of they squad know that you have their best interest in mind and will make convinced(predicate) enough that any actions that ar taken will help ensure you are protected and cared for. It also helps the leader serve as a go out head of the free radical and gains respect from the members of the group. The con to this is that it could be looked at as a weakness. Many times leaders have to make decisions that are not popular with the masses of the group.They make decisions that are bigger than the group but reaps a part benefit for the construe as a whole. If a leader was to be so cerebrate on their members feelings or concerns it could cloud their judgment and show weakness in their ability to make decisions. Lieutenant Colonel Yaron verse Lieutenant Colonel DanielLieutenant Colonel Yaron and Lieutenant Colonel Daniel have some leadership qualities in universalalty such as they both care about their evacuators and evacuates. They both cherished to make sure that both parities involved understood the dynamics of what was attempting to be done and precious both parties to be mentally and physically fain of what may happen. two Yaron and Daniel took advice from others around them to ensure they were making the best decision. They were not acrophobic to vamp up and try another method in order to complete their mission. likewise they both wanted a peaceful aftermath of their removal of the Jews from Gaza. terminus the end the goal was clear to make sure both parties left unharmed and to have the least amount of confusedness as possible. When facial expression at the differences in the leadership roles it unspoilt to say that Yaron took this mission on as his own personal challenge, Yaron, who perceived it as a personal challenge, fastly responded favorably and one week later on was informed that the personal credit line Force Commander had approved his appointment (Laufer, 2012).Daniel on the other hand was just trying to help out the mission no personal attachments were needed for him. Yaron took on many roles as he was coming up with solution for the evacuation such as being apart of the readying aggroup, training police squad up and chief supplier. Yaron also differed from Daniels because he actually went out to meet evacuates to see how the felt and to see the surround that the soldiers would be working in. This is what gave him the upper hand on making his mission successful. He was afraid to do of him self what he asked his soldiers to do. Today both of these types of leaders nevertheless live today so its safe to say that t hey would lead in the same fashion as they did before. sensation is not better that the other though one should be over a incompatible vomit up than the other.The Jung system and constitution traits would consider individualism, these gentlemen acted as though they were study and satisfied with their outcome and decision made to cogitate their outcome, indicating individualism or persona being used. Both had some type of spirituality and or alchemy involved when making their decision, this can be seen by the esthesia being used doing the evacuation process. ConclusionIn conclusion Lieutenant Colonel Yarn and Lieutenants Colonel Daniel had manypersonality traits in common and those that differed from each other. At the end of their evacuation both leaders used what traits they had within them to make the best possible decision that they both feeling worked best for them and the members involved. This just goes to show that there is no wrong way to lead as long as everyone ha s the same goal to achieve. recognitionLaufer, A. (2012). Mastering the leadership role in project steering Practices that lurch remarkable results. fastness Saddle River, NJ Prentice-Hall-PearsonA Peaceful Evacuation turn up fit to Vance Packard, leadership appears to be the art of getting others to want to do something that you are convinced should be done (Lewis, 2003). directhip is a pertinent part of project management. James Lewis (2003) says leadership is not a position its the ability to gain commitment from people. According to Professor Warren G. Bennis, Leaders are people who do the unspoilt thing managers are people who do things right. The importance of leadership in a project is demonstrated in the topic study, A Peaceful Evacuation build a Multi-Project Team Battalion by Leading Upward. This case study involves two leaders, who had similar, but mostly, different leadership styles and strategies. Lieutenant Colonels Yaron and Daniel were both put in charge of enforcing a Disengagement Plan brought frontwards by Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and finding the best pass of action to evacuate settlements along the Gaza Strip. In this raise, I will learn the leadership styles of Lieutenant Colonels Yaron and Daniel and provider three examples of the leadership actions and behaviors for each subject. This essay will then compare and business the Lieutenants and will examine the interrelatedness using the four personality traits and the Jung theory.Lieutenant Colonel Daniel, the chief psychologist of the Southern Command, felt that research was the first step in the project. Daniel conducted searched to locate relevant information on the topic of evacuation to learn from the experience of the past (Laufer, 2012). In the case study, Daniel uses adaptive and participative leadership styles. An adaptive leadership style is a fluid style that takes into consideration the context of the environment and the individual being led. For example , Daniel says, Due to the complex situation, we were concerned that the emotional burden on the soldiers would be too heavyOur success will be measured by the ability to help find the correct balance between finish and sensitivity. A participative leadership style seeks input from others and participates with those they are leading in the decision making process. An example of this leadership style is when Daniel garner other Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) psychologists for a day of thinking together, with the target area ofexpressing and listening to their different opinions about potential problems that may arise in the evacuation project (Laufer, 2012). Daniels strategy was to brainstorm to identify discern issues and mitigate risks. He felt that preparation was the key to completing the mission. Daniel also used the term we, instead of I. His group of psychologists worked as team to identify how to execute the mission according to the governments guidelines sequence ensuring that the damage incurred during the evacuation itself would be minimal.Lieutenant Colonel Yaron displayed two types of leadership styles directive and participative. Directive style is telling people what to do and expecting them to jump right to it. It is one of the oldest styles and frequently called autocratic. Yaron was accustomed to being lead with this style so, in turn he used the same leadership style to lead. Yaron was very hands-on and encouraged the battalions company commanders to initiate ongoing meetings with their soldiers. Yaron met, called and emailed with some of the top officers in the air force. He made immediate inquiries with the top colonels through face-to-face meetings, telephone calls, and email communication. Because of this style, Yaron found that the musical note and motivation of certain staff fell far short of meeting his needs (Laufer, 2012). Yaron wanted to make sure that everyone was on the same page. Yaron is a participative leader because he went to tour the settlement first hand. He wanted to know what his battalion would have to deal with. By visiting the settlement, Yaron know that the mission could not be successful with average squad leaders. team leaders must be top notch because they will be the ones interacting with the people.A Peaceful Evacuation EssayDescribe the leadership style that Lieutenant Colonel Yaron exhibited as the commander of a battalion for theevacuation operation. Provide three (3) examples of his leadership actions and behavior. Discuss the pros and cons in each example you describe to represent the response. Analyze the leadership style that Lieutenant Colonel Daniel exhibited as he took amount of money stage to lead this complex military operation. Provide three (3) examples of his leadership actions and behavior, assessing the pros and cons in each example you describe to support the response.Compare and contrast the leadership styles of Lieutenant Colonel Yaron and Lieutenant Colonel Daniel . Provide three (3) examples of the similarities and differences between these project leaders, and discuss how each leader might address contemporary leadership issues and challenges in Israel today. Discuss Lieutenant Colonel Yaron and Lieutenant Colonel Daniel interrelationship using Jung theory and the four (4) personality traits. Provide three (3) examples of how Lieutenant Colonel Yaron and Lieutenant Colonel Daniel personality and leadership style might enhance or hinder team performance for the complex military operation in this case study. Your date mustBe typed, double spaced, using Times New roman letters font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. invert with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a carry page containing the title of the identification, the students name, the professors name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not includ ed in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are Apply the concepts of project leadership to implement sound leadership practices and effectively lead high-performance teams in a project environment. put the most appropriate leadership style (e.g., directive, consultative, participative, or delegative) in a projectenvironment to effectively manage the project. Analyze the project team using Jung theory and the four personality traits to understand humanbehavior and motivate team members Use technology and information resources to research issues in project management leadership. Write clearly and concisely about project management leadership using proper writing mechanics.A Peaceful Evacuation EssayAbstractThe purpose of this paper is to explain what leadership style Lieutenant Colonel Yaron exhibited as the commander of battalion for the evacuation operations. This paper will give three examples of his leadership a ction and behaviors. This paper will also analyze the leadership style that Lieutenant Colonel Daniel exhibited and give three examples of his leadership action and behaviors. It will discuss the pros and cons of each example given. This paper will then compare and contrast the two Lieutenants and it will take a look at the interrelationship using Jung theory and the four personality traits.Lieutenant Colonel YaronThere are many types of leadership styles one can only imagine what type of leader one would need to be in order to handle the difficult task at hand that Lieutenant Colonel Yaron had to encounter. Yaron displayed two types of leaders directive and participative. During his trial on striving to gain a grasp on what he should do to make this project successful he had many face-to face meetings, telephone calls, and email communications with some top officers in the air force. He was very hands on when it came to approaching commanders of units so he could find suitable sold iers for his task. He even stated himself that he finally felt direct openness and communication between the senior commander and his subordinates (Laufer, 2012). Yaron needed that feeling that everyone was on the same page and he didnt want to move forward with a plan until he knew that everyone one was. This was all a ploy to make sure that the morale level was at one and it worked just nicely. What makes Yarn a participative leader is him putting himself in the same situation that one of his soldiers may be in. for example the visited a home that one of his soldiers would be coming into soon to remove the people within. That experience made him see how settlers were emotionally and how to tell his soldiers how to address the settlers. It was that firsthand experience that made his mission a peaceful mission.The pros of being a directive leader in Yaron case is that he had open communication several departments so everyone was on the same page. This helped keep the lines of commun ication seamless so there should be no reasonto wonder what Yaron wanted and how he wanted to do it. The cons in having this time of leadership in Yarons case is that there were many people that didnt want to follow his plan at first. This could have caused people to rally up against him spread false word about him eventually driving him out of the position he was appointed to. Sometimes keeping information to oneself is half the battle won. Not everyone should know the cards that you hold in your hand. Yaron Him putting himself in the battlefield is great as far as experience is concerned. He was able to relate to the settlers and give that valuable information over to his battalion so they would be prepared. The best teacher is experience. The con of that could have been him being injured and now the army would have to find another leader to help the soldiers remove the settlers from Gaza. Being a leader at times means putting you self in harms way. Lieutenant Colonel DanielLieute nant Colonel Daniel style was that of consultative and participative leadership style. This is shown by Daniels working with a team of psychologist to help refine the guidelines for the evacuation project. He went through several think tanks to see what would work best for the mission at hand. Once he was able to find the best method he then set up workshops. In these workshops, participates were trained to evacuate children and families form their home and to cope with the possibility of evacuation under fire and violence on the part of the settlers (Laufer, 2012). Daniel was concerned about the mental and emotional well being of both the evacuators and evacuees. The cons of being this type of leader is it helps to display an culture of trust where the members of they team know that you have their best interest in mind and will make sure that any actions that are taken will help ensure you are protected and cared for. It also helps the leader serve as a figure head of the group and gains respect from the members of the group. The con to this is that it could be looked at as a weakness. Many times leaders have to make decisions that are not popular with the masses of the group. They make decisions that are bigger than the group but reaps a better benefit for the project as a whole. If a leader was to be so focused on their members feelings or concerns it could cloud their judgment and show weakness in their ability to make decisions. Lieutenant Colonel Yaron verse Lieutenant Colonel DanielLieutenant Colonel Yaron and Lieutenant Colonel Daniel have some leadership qualities in common such as they both care about their evacuators and evacuates. They both wanted to make sure that both parities involved understood the dynamics of what was attempting to be done and wanted both parties to be mentally and physically prepared of what may happen. Both Yaron and Daniel took advice from others around them to ensure they were making the best decision. They were not afraid to revamp and try another method in order to complete their mission. Also they both wanted a peaceful outcome of their removal of the Jews from Gaza. End the end the goal was clear to make sure both parties left unharmed and to have the least amount of confusion as possible. When looking at the differences in the leadership roles it safe to say that Yaron took this mission on as his own personal challenge, Yaron, who perceived it as a personal challenge, immediately responded favorably and one week later was informed that the Air Force Commander had approved his appointment (Laufer, 2012). Daniel on the other hand was just trying to help out the mission no personal attachments were needed for him.Yaron took on many roles as he was coming up with solution for the evacuation such as being apart of the planning team, training team and chief supplier. Yaron also differed from Daniels because he actually went out to meet evacuates to see how the felt and to see the environment that the soldiers would be working in. This is what gave him the upper hand on making his mission successful. He was afraid to do of him self what he asked his soldiers to do. Today both of these types of leaders still live today so its safe to say that they would lead in the same fashion as they did before. One is not better that the other though one should be over a different project than the other. The Jung theory and personality traits would consider individualism, these gentlemen acted as though they were content and satisfied with their outcome and decision made to retrieve their outcome, indicating individualism or persona being used. Both had some type of spirituality and or alchemy involved when making their decision, this can be seen by the sensitivity being used doing the evacuation process.ConclusionIn conclusion Lieutenant Colonel Yarn and Lieutenants Colonel Daniel had manypersonality traits in common and those that differed from each other. At the end of their evacuation both leaders used what traits they had within them to make the best possible decision that they both thought worked best for them and the members involved. This just goes to show that there is no wrong way to lead as long as everyone has the same goal to achieve.ReferenceLaufer, A. (2012). Mastering the leadership role in project management Practices that deliver remarkable results. Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice-Hall-Pearson