.

Friday, February 8, 2019

Enginnering Ethics Paper -- Engineering

In order for an design concept to be considered innovative it must be a new method or product but it can also be a qualifying to an existing method or product. Generally the function of innovation is to bounce back a new obstacle or to improve upon a up-to-date solution to any practice. For the purpose of this paper innovation will non be defined only as an improvement. However, the innovation may precedent new problems to arise. Given this situation the steer may not assimilate taken all the necessary steps to ensure the success of the diligence of the new design. In this paper one such engineer (William LeMessurier) and design concept will be discussed. The definition of innovation in the engineering field will be developed and the question of whether or not there be additional obligations imposed on the engineer as a result of innovation will be addressed.It was previously say that innovation produces new problems which still holds true, but the statement may baffle c onfusion given the definition of innovation as compared to the definition of invention. construct is the generation of an idea while innovation is the attempted implementation of that idea. Having naturalized general definitions an expansion on the definition of innovation is needed. An idea cannot be considered innovative if the application is unsuccessful. In order for a concept to be considered innovative it has to meet the design criteria. An innovative design must possess or more of the following characteristics unusual, ground breaking, novel or a significant transformation from the previous design.In the field of engineering the tubercle between innovative and non-innovative designs is based mostly on pioneering. The purpose of an engineer is to improv... ...tated that the night welding was the result of an upgrade to reflect a youthful change in the NYC building codes2. This statement was deceitful but not irresponsible. The public health, safety and welfare were not i gnored in fellowship with the Citicorp design. Precautions were taken and information was shared among those in a position to stag an impact. Informing the public of a design flaw would most apt(predicate) cause panic and great economic loss. The engineer LeMessurier acted responsibly on his part. As the lead engineer public relations and press releases are not his responsibility.References1. Innovation.. Britannica Family Encyclopedia. Chicago Encyclopedia Britannica, 2008.2. E. HARRIS and R. JAMES, ENGR 482 Class Notes, Texas A&M University (Fall 2009).3. HARRIS,PRITCHARD, RABINS, plan Ethics, Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, Belmont (2009)

No comments:

Post a Comment