Comparing and contrasting Bandura’s cognitive theory Essay

Introduction Perhaps at that place are as many differences as in that respect are connaturalities surrounded by the ideas expressed in Banduras cognitive Theory and Becks cognitive Theory. Many similarities exist between the two theories because they are both establish on the study of human fashion and individualality. However, the ideas expressed and mechanisms used in analysis confer some discord between the two theories. It is manifest that no two somebodys in the world would have exclusively similar thoughts about a phenomenon hence, differences are always abound.Since studies in similar palm are usually related in a way, prevalence of similarities should not occur as a surprise. For example, the fact that behavior is affected by, among separate things, the surround, is embraced in the detail of both theories. The two theorists are also of viridity opinion that negative thoughts are likely to trigger negative behavior and dysfunction in many activities. For example, Ban duras possible action spiritedlights that people with high opinions about themselves are usually better performers in many activities than those who reckon themselves on a lower scale.In the same way, Becks theory is emphatic of the point that negative thoughts in people lead much(prenominal) people to have low opinion of themselves and evaluate themselves negatively. Banduras Cognitive Theory and Becks Cognitive Theory both view the environment as a determinant of personality and behavior. While Bandura (1976) used environmental factors in his triad, Beck (1976) showed that the world (in reference to the environment) is one of the factors that shape a persons behavior, attitudes and perceptions about various phenomena.Both theorists agree that the environment acts together with other factors to shape a persons character and behavior. For instance, Bandura (1986) ascertained that aggressive behavior in adolescents is caused by the environment, but the behavior as well creates a n environment. Bandura referred to such a relationship as reciprocal determinism. On the other hand, Beck (1976) noted that the world shapes a persons character since a person acts in accordance with what is happening in the general world.Disparities in Banduras and Becks theories are evident right from the beginning of the model. While there is a similarity of the use of a triad, the constituents of the triads are the source of dissonance. This is in addition to many other instances in the illustration of the applications of the two models. This newspaper publisher gives an analysis of the similarities and differences in the two theories and the implications or causes of such scenario. Moreover, the paper exit highlight the key areas where similarities as well as differences occur between the two theories.